Medal of honor heroes 2 vs. Call of Duty ...

What do you guys think?Medal of Honor heroes 2 pros- 32 player online, great controls, second best opion to the (at that time) the unavailable voice chatcons- bad graphics, bad A.I, generic story/setting, poor hit detection in multiplayer, lack of varietyMedal of honor heroes 2 vs. Call of Duty ...
Call of dutypros- great graphics, fairly original setting, cinematic, innovative online, with several weapons, upgrades, perks and levelscons- no voice chat, middle of the road contols, friend codes, only 8- player online Winner for meMedal of honor heroes 2 vs. Call of Duty ...
[QUOTE=''voodoo_goodoo'']Call of duty

pros- great graphics, fairly original setting, cinematic, innovative online, with several weapons, upgrades, perks and levels

cons- no voice chat, middle of the road contols, friend codes, only 8- player online





Winner for me[/QUOTE] I would have to go with Call of Duty World at War. And by the way don't make two posts in a row.
CoD WAW, it's cons are not as bad as Medal of Honor :P
Since I only play the two games for the online, I prefer Medal of Honor Heroes 2.
[QUOTE=''voodoo_goodoo'']Call of duty

pros- great graphics, fairly original setting, cinematic, innovative online, with several weapons, upgrades, perks and levels

cons- no voice chat, middle of the road contols, friend codes, only 8- player online





Winner for me[/QUOTE]

Next time put both points in one post.

And I agree, I think COD WAW wins too.
CoD WaW >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOH H2 in every aspect except the number of players online
WaW for me. The only place the controls lack are in Aiming Down the Sight.
Medal of honor is a Clan based game and call of duty is more of a single player with online to extend replay value. both games are great but i choose COD WAW just cause of the campaign mode
World at War is just barely better than Heroes 2WaW's online is far superior to that of H2However, H2 has much better control, runs at over double the frames per second than WaW, and get to enjoy the Caotic 32 person battles even tough there isn't near as many weapons than there is available in WaWMetroid Prime 3: Corruption is still the best FIRST PERSON SHOOTER on the Wii
i have both games and i prefer WaW over mohh2, but mohh2 does have better controls.
On a strictly online fun and replay basis, which game is better?
[QUOTE=''JD42305'']On a strictly online fun and replay basis, which game is better?[/QUOTE]

I say Moh: H2, it just seems to have a stronger online following, and you don't have to rank up for better weapons.
Although I haven't played MoH h2 it looks great based on the reviews but I go with CoD 5 even with bad graphics it still an awesome game
I haven't played CoD yet, but from the feedback I've been reading, it defeats MoH H2 by quality over quantity.
[QUOTE=''IronManRhino''][QUOTE=''JD42305'']On a strictly online fun and replay basis, which game is better?[/QUOTE]

I say Moh: H2, it just seems to have a stronger online following, and you don't have to rank up for better weapons.[/QUOTE]



I'd say CoD WaW. It makes you want to keep on playing, so you can level up and unlock new perks. Also you get to customize your weapons and there is prestige mode
MOHH2 is pretty good, but CoD WaW is amazing.I dont think you can even compare them. WaW has great graphics and it has everything better than MOHH2
cod
[QUOTE=''IronManRhino''][QUOTE=''JD42305'']On a strictly online fun and replay basis, which game is better?[/QUOTE] I say Moh: H2, it just seems to have a stronger online following, and you don't have to rank up for better weapons.[/QUOTE]



The leveling up adds much more longevity to the game. Hit detection is far superior in CoD:WaW also. More weapons, perks, prestige and full fledged rankings make CoD:WaW superior in nearly all aspects of online. The only thing bad is that it is only 8 player online, which I do not mind..
You need both.